What years of tech support taught me about the problem people think they have.


I do tech support for online business owners. Which means I get a front-row seat to what people think is broken.

And the number one thing I hear, by a mile, is this:

"My website isn't working."

So they rebuild it. New template, new colors, new fonts, new layout. Weeks of work, sometimes even months or years. They launch the new one, hold their breath, and…

Crickets. Again.

So they assume the new one isn't good enough either. And they start over. I have watched people rebuild the same website three and four times, getting more discouraged each round, absolutely convinced that the next version will finally be the one.

It almost never is. Because the website was never the problem.

The real problem: your message is fuzzy, not your design

Here's what I usually find when I look at these sites: they're fine. Genuinely. The design is clean, the buttons work, the pages load.
But someone lands on the homepage and can't tell in five seconds who it's for, what problem it solves, or why they should care.
No amount of redesign fixes that, because it isn't a design problem. It's a clarity problem wearing a design problem's clothes.

Let me say the harder version, because it saved me years of my own life: websites don't generate traffic, and they don't create clarity. They display it.

If the thinking underneath is scattered, a prettier site just displays scattered thinking more attractively. You've spent six weeks making your confusion look nicer.

Why we blame the website: it's the visible thing

This isn't a knock on anyone, I did it too, for years. There's a reason it's the default assumption.

The website is visible. It's a thing you can point at, fix, and feel productive about. Rearranging a page gives you a real sense of progress. You can see it changing.

Clarity is invisible. It's sitting with uncomfortable questions like "who is this actually for?" and "what do I actually believe?" Questions with no template, no tutorial, and no satisfying visual payoff at the end.

So of course we pick the visible thing. It feels like work. It just isn't the work that's blocking us.

And there's a second reason: a website is a project with an end. Clarity feels like it might expose that you don't have an answer. Rebuilding is safer than admitting you're not sure what you're selling or to whom.

The five-second test: can a stranger tell what you do?

Here's the fastest diagnostic I know, and it costs nothing.

Open your homepage and read it as a total stranger. Someone who's never heard of you, has no context, and has about five seconds of patience.

Can they tell:
  • Who this is for? (Specifically. Not "everyone" or "women" — one type of person.)
  • What problem it solves? (In their words, not your industry's words.)
  • What to do next? (One obvious action. Not seven.)
If any of those are fuzzy, you found your fix. Here's the good news: it's a writing fix, not a building fix. You don't need a new template. You need clearer sentences, which you can totally do this afternoon, for free.

Even a perfect website won't bring you traffic

There's one more piece people miss, and it's the one that stings a little.

Even a perfectly clear website won't do anything if nobody sees it. My own site sat live for years and got almost no visitors unless I personally sent someone there. Websites are the destination, you are the traffic.

So if you're stuck, run the two checks in order. Is the message clear enough that a stranger gets it in five seconds? And is anyone actually being invited to come look?

Fix those two and the website you already have will probably do just fine.

Want a structured way to get your message clear? Grab the free [One-Page Brand Blueprint] — 20 minutes, and your whole brand fits on one page.

About the Author:


Julie Lewis 
Nutrition Coach | Gamification Expert | Online Business Strategist | Tech Explorer

Julie helps solopreneurs turn grind into flow — building momentum in life and business using the science of engagement. [More about the FROG method →]





0 Comments

Leave a Comment